World Cup 2026 Predictions

I simulated a World Cup Draw based on the following pots, taken from FOOTBALL MEETS DATA




Limitations to Predictions


No rules applied such a limited amount of teams in group per confederation so the draw wouldn't happen in real life. Predictions come from Chat GPT so some of the information is inaccurate or outdated. Still, a lot at what the 2026 World Cup may be like.



A - England, Austria, Paraguay and Saudi Arabia


If England, Austria, Paraguay, and Saudi Arabia were drawn into the same group at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, here's how I would analyze their chances:

1. England

  • Current Strength: England is one of the top footballing nations, consistently performing well in international tournaments. They have a strong squad with players from top clubs in Europe, and their team includes world-class talents across all positions.

  • World Cup Performance: England has reached the semifinals in 2018 and finished fourth in 1990. They are likely to be one of the favorites in any group they are placed in.

2. Austria

  • Current Strength: Austria has a solid national team with players plying their trade in top European leagues, but they are not as strong as England in terms of overall squad depth. Austria has had a few good tournaments but hasn't been able to consistently challenge the top teams.

  • World Cup Performance: Austria has qualified for the World Cup only a few times, with their best result being in 1954 (reaching the semifinals).

3. Paraguay

  • Current Strength: Paraguay is a competitive team in South American football, but they don't currently have the same level of talent as some of the other top teams in the region. However, they are known for their strong defensive style of play and fighting spirit.

  • World Cup Performance: Paraguay reached the quarterfinals in 2010 and has been a consistent qualifier in recent World Cups. They may struggle against more powerful teams but can still be tricky to break down.

4. Saudi Arabia

  • Current Strength: Saudi Arabia has shown growth in recent years, with their national team being a mix of experienced players and emerging talents. They have a competitive league, and some players play in top leagues, but they are still considered to be an underdog in major international tournaments.

  • World Cup Performance: Saudi Arabia has qualified for multiple World Cups but has only made it out of the group stage once (in 1994). Their performances tend to be inconsistent, but they are always eager to challenge.

Predicted Outcome:

  • Winner: England would likely top the group due to their strong squad and overall depth. They are a consistent performer at major tournaments and would be the favorites to finish first.

  • Second Place: Austria would likely finish second, given their solid but less dynamic squad compared to England. They have a more balanced team than Paraguay and Saudi Arabia.

  • Third Place: Paraguay would likely finish third. They are a tough side, but they may struggle to break down stronger European or African teams.

  • Fourth Place: Saudi Arabia might finish last, but they are capable of causing an upset, especially if they focus on a well-organized defensive strategy.

While anything can happen in football, England would be the favorite to win the group, followed by Austria, with Paraguay and Saudi Arabia potentially battling for third place.


B  Italy, Croatia, Ecuador and Venezuela


If Italy, Croatia, Ecuador, and Venezuela were drawn into the same group at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, here's a breakdown of how I would expect each team to perform:

1. Italy

  • Current Strength: Italy is one of the most successful teams in World Cup history, having won four titles (1934, 1938, 1982, and 2006). They are traditionally known for their strong defensive play, but they also have a deep squad with world-class players. In recent years, Italy has been more dynamic, as seen in their Euro 2020 victory.

  • World Cup Performance: Italy has consistently been one of the top teams in the World Cup. While they failed to qualify for the 2018 tournament, they are always a contender when they do qualify. Italy's strong squad and tactical approach make them favorites in any group.

2. Croatia

  • Current Strength: Croatia has emerged as a top-tier team in recent years, having reached the final in 2018 and consistently producing talented players. With stars like Luka Modrić, Ivan Rakitić (though retired from international football), and younger players coming through, Croatia remains a strong force in international football.

  • World Cup Performance: Croatia's best-ever World Cup finish came in 2018, when they finished as runners-up. They are a well-balanced team with experience and skill, making them serious contenders in any group.

3. Ecuador

  • Current Strength: Ecuador has an energetic and youthful team, with a blend of experienced players and emerging talents. They are typically competitive in South American football and have qualified for multiple World Cups. Ecuador's strength lies in their high-pressure, fast-paced style of play, especially in attack.

  • World Cup Performance: Ecuador has qualified for the World Cup four times (2002, 2006, 2014, and 2022) and reached the Round of 16 in 2006. While they are not considered among the very top teams, they can still be dangerous, especially against European teams that are less familiar with their playing style.

4. Venezuela

  • Current Strength: Venezuela is considered one of the weaker teams in South America, but they have been improving in recent years, producing talented players who are making their way into European leagues. Their squad lacks the depth of the other three teams, and they still face challenges at the international level.

  • World Cup Performance: Venezuela has never qualified for the World Cup, but they have become more competitive in recent Copa América tournaments. Despite this, they are still a step behind the other three teams in terms of overall strength.

Predicted Outcome:

  • Winner: Italy would likely top the group. They have a combination of experience, depth, and tactical expertise that would make them favorites to finish first. Their balanced squad and previous World Cup success make them the team to beat in this group.

  • Second Place: Croatia would likely finish second. With their high-quality midfield and solid defense, they have the ability to compete with the best. They may be a bit more inconsistent than Italy but should be strong enough to secure second place in this group.

  • Third Place: Ecuador would likely finish third. They have a fast and energetic style of play, which could cause problems for the other teams, especially if they can capitalize on set pieces and counter-attacks. However, their overall lack of experience at the top level may hinder them against the likes of Italy and Croatia.

  • Fourth Place: Venezuela would likely finish last in this group. While they are improving, they would still face an uphill battle against more experienced and stronger teams like Italy and Croatia. Ecuador might be a close challenge for them, but Venezuela is still a step behind the other three teams in terms of World Cup pedigree.

Summary:

  1. Italy – Likely to win the group due to their depth and experience.

  2. Croatia – Likely to finish second, thanks to their solid squad and recent form.

  3. Ecuador – Could finish third, but may struggle against the stronger teams.

  4. Venezuela – Likely to finish last, as they are still developing at the international level.

Italy and Croatia are the clear favorites in this group, with Ecuador and Venezuela likely fighting for third.


C-  Mexico,Denmark, Panama and Jordan

If Mexico, Denmark, Panama, and Jordan were drawn into the same group at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, here's how the teams would likely perform based on their current strengths:

1. Mexico

  • Current Strength: Mexico has a strong footballing tradition and a talented squad. They consistently perform well in international tournaments, and their players are well-distributed across Europe and North America. With stars like Hirving Lozano, Raúl Jiménez, and Andrés Guardado (though aging), Mexico has a team with a mix of experience and youth.

  • World Cup Performance: Mexico has qualified for every World Cup since 1994 and has made it to the Round of 16 in recent tournaments. They are usually considered one of the stronger teams in their group and are always contenders to progress deep into the knockout stages.

2. Denmark

  • Current Strength: Denmark is a well-organized and disciplined team with a solid defense and a creative midfield. Players like Christian Eriksen, Pierre-Emile Højbjerg, and Kasper Schmeichel make Denmark a very competitive team at the international level. Their balanced style of play makes them dangerous in tournaments.

  • World Cup Performance: Denmark has a rich World Cup history and reached the quarterfinals in 1998. They were also one of the standout teams in the 2020 UEFA European Championship, and they are always tough to break down. Denmark will be among the favorites in this group.

3. Panama

  • Current Strength: Panama is a team that has been steadily improving, with a squad full of experienced players who play in both Central American and European leagues. Their strength lies in their solid defensive structure and physical style of play. They tend to be tough opponents, especially in high-pressure situations.

  • World Cup Performance: Panama made their World Cup debut in 2018 and managed to put up a strong fight, but they were eliminated in the group stage. While not one of the favorites, Panama has the ability to be competitive in a World Cup group.

4. Jordan

  • Current Strength: Jordan has shown progress in recent years, with a solid core of players who play in leagues across the Middle East and Europe. They are generally considered a lower-tier team in Asian football, but they can be tough to break down, especially against teams that underestimate them.

  • World Cup Performance: Jordan has not qualified for a World Cup, but they have been consistent in qualifying for AFC tournaments and have made it to the final stages of qualification on several occasions. They will likely struggle to compete with the other teams in this group but can provide tough competition.

Predicted Outcome:

  1. Mexico – Likely to finish first in the group. With a balanced squad, solid World Cup experience, and top-level talent, Mexico is the favorite to top this group. They are strong in both attack and defense and would be expected to navigate past Denmark, Panama, and Jordan.

  2. Denmark – Likely to finish second. Denmark has a disciplined and organized team, with players who are capable of competing at the highest level. While they may not have the same attacking firepower as Mexico, they are still a very strong team and could challenge for the top spot in the group.

  3. Panama – Likely to finish third. Panama has a strong, physical team and could surprise teams, but they are still a level below the top teams like Mexico and Denmark. However, they will be tough to break down and could challenge for the second spot, especially if Denmark falters.

  4. Jordan – Likely to finish fourth. Although Jordan can be competitive, they would probably struggle to compete with the quality of teams like Mexico and Denmark. They may put up a strong fight, but advancing from this group would be a significant challenge for them.

Summary:

  1. Mexico – Expected to top the group.

  2. Denmark – Likely to finish second.

  3. Panama – Will fight for third, but could be competitive.

  4. Jordan – Likely to finish last, but could still provide challenges.

Mexico and Denmark would be the favorites in this group, with Panama potentially putting up a fight for second place. Jordan would be the underdogs, but they could still make things difficult for the other teams.

D  Belgium, Germany, Cameroon and Norway

If Belgium, Germany, Cameroon, and Norway were drawn into the same group at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, here's how I would expect the teams to perform based on their current strength and recent form:


1. Belgium

  • Current Strength: Belgium has one of the most talented squads in world football, with players like Kevin De Bruyne, Romelu Lukaku, Thibaut Courtois, and Eden Hazard (though his form has dipped). They have been a top team in Europe for the past decade and have often been considered a "golden generation" due to their star-studded lineup.

  • World Cup Performance: Belgium reached the semifinals in 2018 and consistently performs well in international tournaments. They are always a favorite in their group and are expected to make a deep run in 2026 if their key players stay in form.

2. Germany

  • Current Strength: Germany is traditionally one of the strongest teams in world football. They have a deep squad with world-class players in almost every position. With players like Joshua Kimmich, Thomas Müller, Serge Gnabry, and Manuel Neuer (if he continues to play), Germany is always a major contender at major tournaments.

  • World Cup Performance: Germany has won four World Cups (1954, 1974, 1990, and 2014), and they always have a strong squad for the World Cup. While they had a disappointing group-stage exit in 2018, they remain one of the top teams in international football and are likely to bounce back in 2026.

3. Cameroon

  • Current Strength: Cameroon has a talented squad, with players like Vincent Aboubakar, Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting, and André Onana providing leadership. They are one of the top teams in Africa and have a rich footballing history. However, Cameroon often struggles with consistency and depth in comparison to top European sides.

  • World Cup Performance: Cameroon has qualified for the World Cup multiple times, with their best-ever performance being a quarterfinal appearance in 1990. While they have the potential to surprise, they are typically not seen as contenders to win the tournament or even make it out of a tough group.

4. Norway

  • Current Strength: Norway has a promising team, especially with young stars like Erling Haaland (one of the top strikers in the world) and Martin Ødegaard. The team is more competitive now than it has been in recent years, and they have the potential to challenge top sides in the group. However, they are still a developing team without the depth of some of the top European countries.

  • World Cup Performance: Norway has not qualified for the World Cup since 1998, but they have a strong emerging team. While they may not be one of the top teams in the tournament, their youthful energy and Haaland’s goal-scoring ability could cause problems for any team.

Predicted Outcome:

  1. Germany – Likely to finish first. Despite some inconsistencies in recent tournaments, Germany has a depth of talent that is hard to match. Their squad is packed with experience, and their tournament pedigree makes them favorites to top the group.

  2. Belgium – Likely to finish second. Belgium has one of the most talented teams in the world, and while they may face challenges in tournament football due to occasional lack of consistency, their quality and experience will likely see them advance to the knockout stages.

  3. Norway – Likely to finish third. With a standout player like Erling Haaland, Norway has the firepower to cause problems for any team. However, they may struggle with depth and experience in comparison to Germany and Belgium, making them more likely to finish third.

  4. Cameroon – Likely to finish fourth. While Cameroon has a strong squad and can be competitive, they are likely to fall short against the superior teams in the group like Germany and Belgium. They may be able to put up a fight, but advancing from this group would be a challenge.

Summary:

  1. Germany – Expected to top the group with their experience and quality.

  2. Belgium – Likely to finish second, given their talented squad and strong tournament pedigree.

  3. Norway – Likely to finish third, with the potential to challenge but lacking depth compared to the top teams.

  4. Cameroon – Likely to finish fourth, though they can still provide tough opposition.

Germany and Belgium would be the clear favorites in this group, with Norway having a chance to push for the second spot, depending on how they perform. Cameroon would likely struggle against the top European teams but could be competitive


E Brazil, Senegal, Costa Rica and Serbia

If Brazil, Senegal, Costa Rica, and Serbia were drawn into the same group at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, here’s a breakdown of how I would expect the teams to perform based on their current strengths and footballing history:

1. Brazil

  • Current Strength: Brazil is always one of the strongest teams at any World Cup, with a wealth of talent and depth across all positions. With world-class players like Neymar, Vinícius Júnior, Casemiro, Alisson, and others, Brazil has an attacking flair, solid defense, and a winning mentality. Their recent performances in international competitions, including their Copa América 2019 victory, show they are still among the top teams in the world.

  • World Cup Performance: Brazil has won the World Cup five times (1958, 1962, 1970, 1994, and 2002), making them the most successful team in the tournament’s history. They are always considered one of the favorites to win the tournament, and their quality and depth make them the frontrunners in this group.

2. Senegal

  • Current Strength: Senegal is one of the top teams in Africa and has an impressive squad, including players like Sadio Mané, Kalidou Koulibaly, and Edouard Mendy. Their mix of experience and youth, along with their physicality and attacking play, makes them a formidable opponent. Senegal is known for their strong defense and quick transitions, making them dangerous in knockout tournaments.

  • World Cup Performance: Senegal reached the quarterfinals in 2002 and came very close to advancing even further. They have been one of the best teams in Africa in recent years, including winning the Africa Cup of Nations in 2021. Senegal will likely be a strong contender to finish in the top two of this group.

3. Serbia

  • Current Strength: Serbia has a talented squad with players like Dušan Tadić, Aleksandar Mitrović, Sergej Milinković-Savić, and others playing in top European leagues. They are a physically strong team with a solid attacking line and play a disciplined style of football. Serbia is a team that can compete with top sides, although they can be inconsistent.

  • World Cup Performance: Serbia has qualified for the World Cup multiple times and reached the group stage in 2018. They can be dangerous on their day, but their overall consistency can be a question mark. However, they are still a team that can challenge for qualification from a tough group.

4. Costa Rica

  • Current Strength: Costa Rica has a competitive team, with a strong defensive foundation and experienced players like Keylor Navas (one of the top goalkeepers in the world) and Bryan Ruiz. Costa Rica is known for its disciplined and organized approach, and they often perform well against stronger teams due to their well-structured defensive tactics.

  • World Cup Performance: Costa Rica's best World Cup performance came in 2014, when they reached the quarterfinals. While they may not have the attacking prowess of some of the other teams in the group, they can be tough to break down and have a reputation for causing upsets in major tournaments.

Predicted Outcome:

  1. Brazil – Likely to finish first. With their deep squad, skillful attacking players, and a strong tournament pedigree, Brazil is the clear favorite to top the group. Their combination of attacking flair, midfield control, and solid defense will likely see them through the group stage with ease.

  2. Senegal – Likely to finish second. Senegal has the quality and momentum to compete with any team. Their mix of strength, skill, and experience, led by players like Sadio Mané, makes them a very strong side. They are likely to secure second place in the group, though they could push Brazil for the top spot depending on their performances.

  3. Serbia – Likely to finish third. Serbia has a talented team that could be dangerous in any group, especially with their attacking strength. However, they might struggle against the top teams like Brazil and Senegal, but they should have enough to secure third place.

  4. Costa Rica – Likely to finish fourth. Costa Rica will make things difficult for the other teams, especially with their well-organized defense and experienced players. However, they may lack the firepower and overall quality to compete with Brazil and Senegal for the top two spots. Still, they can provide tough resistance and might challenge Serbia for third place.

Summary:

  1. Brazil – Expected to top the group with their quality and depth.

  2. Senegal – Likely to finish second, with a very strong squad and recent success.

  3. Serbia – Likely to finish third, with an ability to challenge but perhaps lacking consistency against top sides.

  4. Costa Rica – Likely to finish fourth, although they can still be a tough opponent due to their disciplined play.

Brazil and Senegal would be the favorites to advance from this group, with Serbia and Costa Rica fighting for third. While Costa Rica can be a tough competitor, Brazil and Senegal are the clear frontrunners in this group.


F Argentina, Iran, Egypt and UAE

If Argentina, Iran, Egypt, and UAE were drawn into the same group at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, here’s how I would expect the teams to perform based on their current strength, footballing history, and the general level of talent they possess:

1. Argentina

  • Current Strength: Argentina is one of the top teams in world football, with a squad packed with world-class talent, including Lionel Messi (who may be in the twilight of his career by 2026 but will still be a key figure), Lautaro Martínez, Ángel Di María, and others. Argentina's strength lies in its attacking quality, defensive organization, and midfield control. They are consistently one of the best teams in South America and globally.

  • World Cup Performance: Argentina has won the World Cup twice (1978 and 1986) and is always a favorite to go deep in any tournament. They reached the final in 2014 and won the 2021 Copa América. Argentina is likely to be one of the top contenders in this group.

2. Iran

  • Current Strength: Iran is one of the strongest teams in Asia, with players who perform in top leagues in Europe and Asia. They are known for their well-organized defense, tactical discipline, and physicality. Players like Sardar Azmoun and Mehdi Taremi are key threats for Iran, and they have a solid team under experienced management.

  • World Cup Performance: Iran has qualified for multiple World Cups, and while they haven't progressed past the group stage, they are consistently a tough team to beat. Iran will likely be competitive in this group, and while they may not be favorites to finish in the top two, they are a team that can cause trouble.

3. Egypt

  • Current Strength: Egypt has a strong team, led by one of the best players in the world, Mohamed Salah. Egypt’s squad features talented players in attack and defense, with players like Ahmed Hegazi and Trezeguet contributing to the team's balance. Their style is often centered around a strong defense and the creativity of Salah up front.

  • World Cup Performance: Egypt has qualified for the World Cup multiple times, with their best performance being reaching the Round of 16 in 1990. They are always competitive in Africa and can cause problems for top teams, especially with a player like Salah, who can make a difference in big matches.

4. UAE

  • Current Strength: The UAE has a developing team, with a mixture of experienced players and emerging talent. They are typically competitive in Asian football, with players like Ali Mabkhout providing a goal-scoring threat. While they don’t have the same level of depth as the other teams in this group, they can still cause an upset on their day.

  • World Cup Performance: The UAE has qualified for the World Cup once (1990) and has generally been less consistent in making it to major tournaments. They would be considered underdogs in this group, and while they may put up a strong fight, their lack of overall quality compared to Argentina, Iran, and Egypt might hinder their progress.

Predicted Outcome:

  1. Argentina – Likely to finish first. Argentina is the clear favorite in this group with their world-class players and depth. Their attacking options, midfield control, and solid defense make them the most complete team in this group, and they would be expected to top it without too much difficulty.

  2. Egypt – Likely to finish second. Egypt, with Mohamed Salah, has the potential to finish second in this group. While they may not have the depth or overall talent of Argentina, they can still cause problems for teams with their defensive organization and the match-winning ability of Salah.

  3. Iran – Likely to finish third. Iran is a strong team in Asia, but they may struggle to overcome both Argentina and Egypt, particularly when it comes to creating scoring opportunities. They will be tough to break down, but finishing third is a more realistic expectation.

  4. UAE – Likely to finish fourth. While the UAE can be competitive, they are likely to be outmatched by the quality of Argentina, Egypt, and even Iran. They will likely finish last in the group, though they may still provide tough competition and could cause an upset if the other teams are not careful.

Summary:

  1. Argentina – Expected to top the group with their strength and quality.

  2. Egypt – Likely to finish second, thanks to Salah's ability to make a difference.

  3. Iran – Likely to finish third, with a strong defense but not enough attacking firepower to compete with the top two.

  4. UAE – Likely to finish fourth, though they could put up a fight against the other teams.

Argentina and Egypt would be the favorites to progress from this group, with Iran potentially putting up a tough challenge for second place. The UAE would face an uphill battle but could still be competitive in the group

G  USA, South Korea, Australia and Turkey

If USA, South Korea, Australia, and Turkey were drawn into the same group at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, here’s how the teams might fare based on their current strength, form, and footballing history:

1. USA

  • Current Strength: The United States has a young and talented squad, with players like Christian Pulisic, Weston McKennie, Gio Reyna, and Sergiño Dest. They are a team on the rise, with a blend of experience and emerging talents who play in top European leagues. The USA is known for their athleticism, work rate, and solid team chemistry.

  • World Cup Performance: The USA has qualified for every World Cup since 1990 (except for 2018) and has made it to the knockout stages in recent tournaments. In 2022, they reached the Round of 16, showing they are a competitive force. With the 2026 World Cup being hosted by the USA (along with Canada and Mexico), they will be especially motivated and have the home advantage, which could give them a boost in this group.

2. South Korea

  • Current Strength: South Korea remains one of the top teams in Asia, with players like Son Heung-min, Hwang Hee-chan, and Lee Jae-sung playing at high levels in Europe. Their playing style is fast, disciplined, and organized, with a strong work ethic. They are known for their tactical discipline and fighting spirit, especially in high-stakes games.

  • World Cup Performance: South Korea has a strong World Cup history, with their best performance being a semi-final appearance in 2002. In recent years, they have remained competitive, consistently making it to the knockout stages. South Korea is typically one of the top teams in Asia and will pose a serious challenge in this group.

3. Australia

  • Current Strength: Australia has a team full of experienced players, with stars like Mathew Ryan, Aaron Mooy, and Tom Rogic, along with younger talents like Harry Souttar and Awer Mabil. Australia is known for its hardworking, organized style of play, and their physicality often makes them tough opponents. Their style is more pragmatic compared to some other nations, focusing on solid defense and counter-attacking play.

  • World Cup Performance: Australia has qualified for the last four World Cups and has made it to the knockout stages once, in 2006. They tend to be solid, tough teams that may lack the flair of other countries but can be effective in a tournament setting. Their experience and toughness will be key assets in this group.

4. Turkey

  • Current Strength: Turkey has a solid squad with quality players like Hakan Çalhanoğlu, Merih Demiral, and Cengiz Ünder. Turkey is traditionally known for its passionate play and strong tactical discipline. While they may lack the depth of some of the other top European teams, they have a mix of experienced and younger players that can be dangerous, especially when they are at their best.

  • World Cup Performance: Turkey’s best World Cup performance was a third-place finish in 2002. They have struggled to qualify for recent tournaments, but they are still a competitive side in Europe. With their mix of creativity and tactical awareness, Turkey could be a team to watch, though they may be inconsistent at times.

Predicted Outcome:

  1. USA – Likely to finish first. With the home advantage, a youthful and talented squad, and growing international experience, the USA will be the favorites in this group. Their blend of dynamic attacking play and solid defense gives them the edge, and they will be eager to make a deep run, especially with the added motivation of playing on home soil.

  2. South Korea – Likely to finish second. South Korea has a well-balanced squad, led by the world-class Son Heung-min. They are likely to be competitive against any team in this group, with their disciplined and tactical approach making them a strong contender to progress to the knockout stages. They are typically tough in group stages and will be looking to continue their consistency.

  3. Turkey – Likely to finish third. Turkey has the quality to challenge for second place, but their inconsistency in recent years could hinder their ability to progress. They have the potential to cause problems for both the USA and South Korea, but it might be a challenge to match the consistency of the other two. They could make a push for the knockout stages but would need to be at their best.

  4. Australia – Likely to finish fourth. Australia will be a tough opponent, but they might struggle to compete with the higher quality of teams like the USA and South Korea. Their solid defensive setup and physical style could make them difficult to break down, but they may lack the attacking flair to secure enough points to progress.

Summary:

  1. USA – Expected to top the group, boosted by the home advantage and a talented squad.

  2. South Korea – Likely to finish second, with their tactical discipline and star power, especially Son Heung-min.

  3. Turkey – Likely to finish third, as they have the potential to challenge, but inconsistency might hold them back.

  4. Australia – Likely to finish fourth, despite their solid and physical style of play, as they might lack the attacking quality to compete with the top teams in the group.

The USA and South Korea would be the favorites to progress, with Turkey and Australia battling for third. It should be an interesting group, with all teams capable of causing surprises.


H Canada, Morocco, Algeria and Greece


If Canada, Morocco, Algeria, and Greece were drawn into the same group at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, here's a breakdown of how each team might fare based on their current strength, form, and historical performance:

1. Canada

  • Current Strength: Canada has significantly improved in recent years, particularly with the emergence of players like Alphonso Davies, Jonathan David, and Cyle Larin. Their young squad is filled with talent and energy, and they play a fast, counter-attacking style of football. Canada is also boosted by a strong defensive unit, which has made them more competitive in recent years, especially in World Cup qualifying.

  • World Cup Performance: Canada qualified for the World Cup in 2022 after a 36-year absence and showed promise in the tournament, even though they didn’t make it out of the group stage. The 2026 World Cup, co-hosted by Canada, will offer them a home advantage and the motivation to go further. Given their progress in recent years, Canada is likely to be one of the stronger sides in this group.

2. Morocco

  • Current Strength: Morocco is one of the top teams in Africa, with a squad that combines youth and experience. Players like Achraf Hakimi, Hakim Ziyech, and Yassine Bounou give Morocco quality on both ends of the pitch. They are known for their strong defensive organization, quick counter-attacks, and technical ability.

  • World Cup Performance: Morocco has had a strong World Cup history, reaching the Round of 16 in 1986 and securing an impressive run to the semifinals of the 2022 World Cup, making it one of the standout performances by an African team in recent memory. With such momentum and a solid squad, Morocco will be a favorite to advance from this group.

3. Algeria

  • Current Strength: Algeria has a well-balanced team with key players such as Riyad Mahrez, Ismaël Bennacer, and Sofiane Feghouli. The team is known for its technical quality and fast attacking play, as well as a solid defense. While Algeria has some depth, they have struggled to reach the same heights as some other African sides in recent tournaments.

  • World Cup Performance: Algeria has had some good World Cup performances, with their best run being in 2014, where they reached the Round of 16. They have also been a consistent team in African football and have the potential to challenge any team in the group. However, they may be slightly behind Morocco in terms of overall squad quality at the moment.

4. Greece

  • Current Strength: Greece has a history of being tough to break down, known for their defensive solidity and disciplined approach. With players like Konstantinos Manolas, Giorgos Giakoumakis, and Sokratis Papastathopoulos, Greece’s team is built around solid organization and experience. However, they have struggled to find the attacking quality needed to truly challenge at the highest levels in recent years.

  • World Cup Performance: Greece won the 2004 UEFA European Championship and made it to the Round of 16 in the 2014 World Cup. However, their recent form has been inconsistent, and they’ve missed out on recent major tournaments. Their World Cup qualification in 2026 is key to showing they are still competitive, but they will face stiff competition in this group.

Predicted Outcome:

  1. Morocco – Likely to finish first. Morocco's recent success in major tournaments, particularly their impressive World Cup 2022 run, along with a well-rounded squad, makes them the favorites to top the group. Their defensive organization and attacking flair will likely be enough to finish on top.

  2. Canada – Likely to finish second. Canada has been rising in stature in international football, with a talented, young squad and a strong home advantage in 2026. Their speed and attacking play, along with their ability to defend well, should allow them to finish second, as long as they perform at their best.

  3. Algeria – Likely to finish third. Algeria has the quality to challenge but might lack the consistency to compete with Morocco and Canada, especially with a tough group. Still, with key players like Riyad Mahrez, they can cause problems for any team in the group.

  4. Greece – Likely to finish fourth. While Greece is always a tough team to break down, their lack of attacking firepower in recent years could hurt their chances in a group with teams like Morocco and Canada. They will be difficult to beat, but it will be hard for them to make it out of the group without finding their attacking rhythm.

Summary:

  1. Morocco – Expected to top the group with their solid defense and attacking quality.

  2. Canada – Likely to finish second, fueled by their home advantage and a young, talented squad.

  3. Algeria – Likely to finish third, with quality but possibly lacking the consistency needed to challenge for second.

  4. Greece – Likely to finish fourth, although they are a tough opponent, their lack of attacking options may hold them back.

Morocco and Canada are the favorites to advance from this group, while Algeria and Greece will likely fight for third, with Greece perhaps facing the toughest road to progress.



I Holland, Switzerland, Uzbekistan and Congo DR


If Holland (Netherlands), Switzerland, Uzbekistan, and Congo DR were drawn into the same group at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, here’s a breakdown of how the teams might fare based on their current strength, form, and historical performance:

1. Holland (Netherlands)

  • Current Strength: The Netherlands is a footballing powerhouse with a rich history and a very talented squad. Players like Virgil van Dijk, Frenkie de Jong, Memphis Depay, and Donyell Malen lead a well-balanced team with world-class players in nearly every position. The Dutch are known for their attacking play, technical skills, and solid defensive organization.

  • World Cup Performance: The Netherlands has reached the World Cup final three times (1974, 1978, and 2010) and has a history of strong performances in international tournaments. They missed out on the 2018 World Cup, but in 2022, they reached the quarterfinals. They are always considered one of the favorites in any tournament and would likely top this group.

2. Switzerland

  • Current Strength: Switzerland is known for its strong defensive setup, tactical discipline, and solid organization. Players like Granit Xhaka, Xherdan Shaqiri, and Yann Sommer form the backbone of the team, and Switzerland is often difficult to break down. They also have a good mix of youth and experience.

  • World Cup Performance: Switzerland has been consistently strong in recent World Cups, reaching the Round of 16 in 2014 and 2018, and they showed their potential in the Euro 2020 tournament, where they reached the quarterfinals. Their ability to grind out results makes them a tough opponent for any team, though they may not have the attacking flair of some other teams in this group.

3. Uzbekistan

  • Current Strength: Uzbekistan is an emerging team in Asian football, with players like Eldor Shomurodov (who plays in Serie A) adding quality to the squad. While Uzbekistan has shown promise in regional competitions, they have yet to consistently challenge at the highest levels in world football.

  • World Cup Performance: Uzbekistan has not yet qualified for a World Cup, but they are often competitive in Asian football. They have a solid squad and will be looking to impress in their first-ever World Cup appearance in 2026. However, their lack of major tournament experience may put them at a disadvantage against the more established teams in the group.

4. Congo DR

  • Current Strength: The Democratic Republic of the Congo (Congo DR) is an African team with a strong mix of physicality, flair, and pace. Players like Chancel Mbemba, Yannick Bolasie, and Cédric Bakambu can make an impact in international football. They are capable of causing upsets, but their inconsistency and lack of experience in major international tournaments might limit their progress.

  • World Cup Performance: Congo DR has never qualified for the World Cup, but they are a competitive team in African football. They have had success in the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON), but their relatively low ranking in the global football hierarchy might see them struggle in a tough group.

Predicted Outcome:

  1. Holland (Netherlands) – Likely to finish first. With their talented squad and strong footballing pedigree, the Netherlands would be the favorites to top the group. Their mix of solid defense, midfield control, and attacking options makes them the clear favorite in this group.

  2. Switzerland – Likely to finish second. Switzerland is a consistently strong team in international football, and their well-organized defense and tactical discipline make them a tough opponent for any team. They may lack the attacking brilliance of the Netherlands, but they will likely be able to secure enough points to finish second in the group.

  3. Congo DR – Likely to finish third. Congo DR is a physically strong team that can be dangerous on their day, but they may struggle against the more technically proficient sides like the Netherlands and Switzerland. Their lack of World Cup experience and inconsistency could make it difficult to qualify from this group.

  4. Uzbekistan – Likely to finish fourth. While Uzbekistan is an emerging force in Asian football, they are likely to be outclassed by the experience and quality of the other three teams in the group. They could still put up a good fight, but they may struggle to compete with the top sides in the group.

Summary:

  1. Holland (Netherlands) – Expected to top the group with their quality and depth.

  2. Switzerland – Likely to finish second, with their solid, disciplined style of play.

  3. Congo DR – Likely to finish third, with the potential to cause upsets but likely lacking the consistency to challenge for second place.

  4. Uzbekistan – Likely to finish fourth, though they could surprise with a strong performance.

Holland and Switzerland would be the favorites to advance from this group, with Congo DR and Uzbekistan fighting for third. The Netherlands' superior quality and experience make them the clear frontrunners to win the group.


J Spain, Japan, Ivory Coast and Honduras

If Spain, Japan, Ivory Coast, and Honduras were drawn into the same group at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, here's a breakdown of how the teams might perform based on their current strength, footballing history, and potential:

1. Spain

  • Current Strength: Spain remains one of the top teams in world football, with a blend of experienced players and exciting young talents. With players like Pedri, Gavi, Sergio Busquets, and Dani Olmo, Spain continues to have an excellent technical and tactical approach. They play possession-based football with fluid movement and high pressing, which is difficult for most teams to handle.

  • World Cup Performance: Spain won the World Cup in 2010 and has consistently been one of the top European sides. They also won the European Championship in 2008 and 2012. While they have undergone a slight transition in recent years, Spain remains one of the favorites in any tournament. Their deep squad and experience make them strong contenders to top this group.

2. Japan

  • Current Strength: Japan is one of the strongest teams in Asia, known for its discipline, work rate, and technical ability. Players like Takumi Minamino, Kaoru Mitoma, Daichi Kamada, and Wataru Endo give Japan an attacking edge and solid midfield presence. Japan has a well-organized defense and a fast, high-tempo style of play.

  • World Cup Performance: Japan has qualified for every World Cup since 1998 and has reached the Round of 16 in recent tournaments, including 2018. They have become a consistent force in world football, capable of causing upsets against higher-ranked teams. Japan is expected to challenge for second place in this group and will be difficult for any team to break down.

3. Ivory Coast

  • Current Strength: Ivory Coast has some fantastic individual talent, including players like Nicolas Pépé, Wilfried Zaha, Franck Kessié, and Serge Aurier. They are known for their physicality, pace, and technical ability. The team has been historically one of the strongest in Africa and has a mix of experienced and younger players.

  • World Cup Performance: Ivory Coast won the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) in 2015 and has regularly qualified for World Cups. They have a lot of individual flair but have sometimes lacked consistency in major tournaments. While they are a formidable team, they may struggle against the tactical discipline of teams like Spain and Japan. Still, they have the potential to cause problems for any team in the group.

4. Honduras

  • Current Strength: Honduras has a team that is known for its grit, physicality, and work ethic. Players like Romell Quioto, Albert Elis, and Anthony Lozano offer attacking threat, while they typically rely on a strong defensive structure. However, their overall talent and depth are not at the level of some of the other teams in this group.

  • World Cup Performance: Honduras has qualified for the World Cup three times (1982, 2010, and 2014). While they are known for being tough competitors in CONCACAF, their recent form has not been as strong, and they will face a tough challenge in this group. They may struggle to compete with the quality of teams like Spain, Japan, and Ivory Coast.

Predicted Outcome:

  1. Spain – Likely to finish first. Spain has the quality, depth, and experience to top this group. Their possession-based style, technical excellence, and tactical discipline make them clear favorites to finish at the top.

  2. Japan – Likely to finish second. Japan is a highly organized, disciplined team with a strong blend of technical ability and work rate. They should have enough quality to secure second place in this group, especially with their ability to handle tough matches.

  3. Ivory Coast – Likely to finish third. Ivory Coast has the talent to cause problems but might not be consistent enough to finish in the top two. Their physical style of play could pose difficulties for Spain and Japan, but they may fall short when it comes to overall tactical organization.

  4. Honduras – Likely to finish fourth. Honduras is a competitive team, but the quality and depth of the other sides in this group will likely overwhelm them. While they will fight hard and make things difficult for their opponents, their lack of individual talent and recent form may see them finish at the bottom.

Summary:

  1. Spain – Expected to top the group with their quality, tactical discipline, and depth.

  2. Japan – Likely to finish second, thanks to their well-organized play and technical ability.

  3. Ivory Coast – Likely to finish third, with the potential to challenge for second but likely lacking consistency.

  4. Honduras – Likely to finish fourth, though they will be a tough opponent, they will probably not have enough quality to progress.

Spain and Japan are the favorites to advance from this group, with Ivory Coast and Honduras likely competing for third. Spain's superior quality and tactical approach should see them top the group, with Japan securing second placE.


K France, Colombia, South Africa and Ghana

If France, Colombia, South Africa, and Ghana were drawn into the same group at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, here’s a breakdown of how each team might fare based on their current strength, form, and historical performance:

1. France

  • Current Strength: France is one of the powerhouses in world football, with a squad that is filled with world-class players across all positions. Key players include Kylian Mbappé, Antoine Griezmann, N'Golo Kanté, Paul Pogba, and Raphaël Varane. France boasts incredible depth, quality, and tactical flexibility, making them a top contender in any competition.

  • World Cup Performance: France is the 2018 World Cup champion and reached the final of the 2022 World Cup, finishing as runners-up. Their track record in recent years has been impeccable, and they have the experience and talent to dominate any group in the tournament.

  • Expected Outcome: France will be the favorites to top this group with their immense quality and depth.

2. Colombia

  • Current Strength: Colombia has a squad full of talent, with players like James Rodríguez, Luis Díaz, Radamel Falcao, and Duvan Zapata bringing both experience and flair. The Colombian team is known for its attacking style of play, technical ability, and creativity, often relying on individual brilliance to unlock opposition defenses.

  • World Cup Performance: Colombia’s best World Cup performance came in 2014 when they reached the quarterfinals. They also made it to the Round of 16 in 2018. While they have been consistent in recent years, their lack of a truly dominant side might hinder them against stronger teams in the group, but they will still be a very tough opponent.

  • Expected Outcome: Colombia is likely to finish second, with enough talent to edge out the other teams in the group but still fall behind France.

3. South Africa

  • Current Strength: South Africa has a squad with players like Percy Tau, Bongani Zungu, and Thulani Hlatshwayo, though they are not as internationally renowned as some of the other teams in this group. South Africa’s football style is typically solid defensively, with an emphasis on teamwork and counter-attacking football. However, they tend to struggle against more tactically organized or higher-quality teams.

  • World Cup Performance: South Africa’s best World Cup performance came in 1998, when they reached the group stages, and they have qualified for three World Cups in total (1998, 2002, 2010). However, they have not advanced beyond the group stage in recent years and are not considered one of the top contenders in world football.

  • Expected Outcome: South Africa is likely to finish fourth in this group, as they lack the attacking firepower and overall quality to compete with teams like France and Colombia.

4. Ghana

  • Current Strength: Ghana has a strong squad with talented players such as Thomas Partey, Jordan Ayew, Andre Ayew, and Mohammed Kudus. The Black Stars have a reputation for being tough, competitive, and athletic. Their playing style can be both direct and physical, and they have often performed well in tournaments like the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON).

  • World Cup Performance: Ghana’s best World Cup performance came in 2010 when they reached the quarterfinals. They have been a regular feature in recent World Cups and have a strong tradition of punching above their weight, but they have struggled to maintain consistency in recent years.

  • Expected Outcome: Ghana is likely to finish third, as they have the potential to challenge Colombia but may fall short when competing against France and Colombia in terms of overall quality and consistency.

Predicted Outcome:

  1. FranceLikely to finish first. With their combination of world-class talent, depth, and recent tournament success, France is the clear favorite to top this group. Their squad is stacked in every position, and their tactical discipline, experience, and quality will be too much for the other teams to overcome.

  2. ColombiaLikely to finish second. Colombia has the attacking flair and creativity to cause problems for teams like South Africa and Ghana. Their squad is full of individuals capable of turning a game, and while they may lack the consistency to challenge France, they should be able to secure enough points to progress.

  3. GhanaLikely to finish third. Ghana is a competitive team, but their inconsistency and lack of depth compared to France and Colombia will likely see them struggle to get out of the group. They could make life difficult for the other teams, especially with their physicality and counter-attacking style.

  4. South AfricaLikely to finish fourth. Despite their hardworking nature, South Africa is likely to be outclassed by the other teams in this group. Their defensive style and lack of standout attacking talent will make it difficult for them to secure enough points to advance past the group stage.

Summary:

  1. France – Expected to dominate the group with their quality, depth, and recent tournament success.

  2. Colombia – Likely to finish second, with enough talent to secure progression but perhaps lacking the quality to top the group.

  3. Ghana – Likely to finish third, competing fiercely but ultimately falling short against higher-quality opponents.

  4. South Africa – Likely to finish fourth, though they will fight hard, they will probably lack the overall quality to progress.

France and Colombia are the favorites to advance, with Ghana and South Africa likely battling for third. France’s superior quality and recent tournament pedigree should see them top the gro


L Portugal, Uruguay, Tunisia and New Zealand

If Porugal, Uruguay, Tunisia, and New Zealand were drawn into the same group at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, here's a breakdown of how the teams might fare based on their current strength, form, and historical performance:

1. Portugal

  • Current Strength: Portugal remains one of the top footballing nations in the world, with a squad filled with world-class talent, including Cristiano Ronaldo, Bruno Fernandes, João Félix, Bernardo Silva, and Rúben Dias. Their playing style is often characterized by dynamic attacking football, technical brilliance, and solid defensive organization. Portugal is a well-balanced team capable of competing against the best.

  • World Cup Performance: Portugal won the European Championship in 2016 and the UEFA Nations League in 2019, and they consistently qualify for major tournaments. Although their World Cup performances have been inconsistent at times, with their best finish being 3rd place in 1966, they are always one of the top teams to watch in any competition. With a mix of experienced players and rising stars, Portugal is expected to be a serious contender in this group.

  • Expected Outcome: Portugal is the clear favorite to top the group, with their superior quality, tactical approach, and star power.

2. Uruguay

  • Current Strength: Uruguay is a very solid and experienced team, known for its defensive solidity, grit, and tenacity. With players like Luis Suárez, Edinson Cavani, Federico Valverde, Rodrigo Bentancur, and José María Giménez, Uruguay boasts a good mix of attacking flair and defensive stability. The team often relies on a strong team ethic and the ability to grind out results in tough matches.

  • World Cup Performance: Uruguay has a rich World Cup history, having won the tournament in 1930 and 1950. More recently, they reached the semifinals in 2010 and the quarterfinals in 2018. Their consistency in major tournaments and their competitive edge make them a strong team, though they will be facing stiff competition from Portugal in this group.

  • Expected Outcome: Uruguay is likely to finish second in the group, competing strongly for top spot, but Portugal’s overall depth and quality will likely put them in second place.

3. Tunisia

  • Current Strength: Tunisia has a solid and organized team, with a blend of experience and youthful talent. Key players like Youssef Msakni, Wahbi Khazri, and Aymen Abdennour bring both flair and defensive solidity to the squad. Tunisia is known for their discipline and tactical awareness, but they often struggle to match the attacking power and quality of some of the top teams.

  • World Cup Performance: Tunisia has participated in five World Cups, but they’ve yet to make it past the group stage in recent years. They are often competitive but lack the firepower to challenge the stronger sides in the tournament. Tunisia will need to produce an exceptional performance to progress from this group.

  • Expected Outcome: Tunisia is likely to finish fourth in this group. They are a tough team to break down, but they might lack the offensive edge needed to secure points against teams like Portugal and Uruguay.

4. New Zealand

  • Current Strength: New Zealand is a team that is often characterized by physicality, organization, and a solid team structure. While they don’t have as many standout players as some of the other teams in the group, they are known for their strong work ethic and resilience. Players like Chris Wood and Kosta Barbarouses are key contributors to the team’s attacking play.

  • World Cup Performance: New Zealand has qualified for the World Cup once, in 2010, but they failed to make it past the group stage. They often rely on a defensive and counter-attacking style of play, but their lack of depth and quality compared to teams like Portugal and Uruguay will likely put them at a disadvantage in this group.

  • Expected Outcome: New Zealand is likely to finish third in the group. While they will be tough to break down, they may struggle against the technical and physical quality of Portugal and Uruguay, though they could put up a fight for a possible third-place finish.

Predicted Outcome:

  1. PortugalLikely to finish first. With their world-class talent and tactical approach, Portugal is the favorite to top the group. They have the quality in every area of the pitch and are well-equipped to secure top spot in this group.

  2. UruguayLikely to finish second. Uruguay will be competitive and difficult to break down, with a good mix of experienced and younger players. Their defensive strength and ability to counter-attack will likely see them finish second, though they will fall just short of Portugal in terms of overall quality.

  3. New ZealandLikely to finish third. New Zealand is a resilient team, but their lack of quality compared to the other teams in the group will likely see them fall behind. However, they could cause problems for Tunisia and could challenge for third place.

  4. TunisiaLikely to finish fourth. Tunisia is a disciplined team, but their lack of attacking power and difficulty in breaking down top teams will likely see them struggle to earn points in this competitive group.

Summary:

  1. Portugal – Expected to top the group with their quality, depth, and tactical approach.

  2. Uruguay – Likely to finish second, with their strong defensive structure and attacking threat.

  3. New Zealand – Likely to finish third, competing hard but lacking the quality to break into the top two.

  4. Tunisia – Likely to finish fourth, though they will be tough defensively, they may struggle to score goals and challenge the stronger teams.

Portugal and Uruguay are the favorites to progress from this group, with Portugal expected to finish first and Uruguay second. New Zealand and Tunisia are likely to battle for third, but both teams will need strong performances to make it out of the group.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

one day...

Israel - Palestine. My view

Israel Palestine